![]() ![]() Munt is good for a lot of retro stuff but fluidsynth I'm sure is a better choice for GM stuff. Here is a thread about running munt on a rpi2 on Vogons: Īnd a thread about a rpi3 synth box that might be useful for scripts/compiling info: So if there was a way to route the audio to the fpga for mixing that could be something to look at too. But fluidsynth can also be run with soundfonts that are similar to other roland/retro synths. ![]() Obviously, Munt is the best option for retro systems. But Munt might be close to taking up a full core on MiSTer. I compiled it myself for my own project and munt ran fine for me though. Ghogan42 wrote:On some older projects using the rpi2 and rpi3 some people had buffer underruns and the like when running munt because of cpu speed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |